Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1989 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 26% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $70.0 vs $94.05
- Up to 13% better value when playing Starfield than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $1.49 vs $1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 17% better in Starfield than Core i7-2600K - 55 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
47
85.45454545454545%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349813 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
87.13450292397661%
Price, $
$94.05
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
56.61016949152542%
Multi-Core
2320
42.33576642335766%
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |