Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 1057 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Celeron G1820 - 165 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $46.41 vs $70.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-2600K - $0.28 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 53 vs 95 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
66.66666666666667%
Price, $
$70
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359793 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
163
98.7878787878788%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359793 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
73.50299401197606%
Multi-Core
825
35.560344827586206%
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |