Buy on Amazon
$319.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 1296 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than Celeron G3900 - 616 vs 614 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $39.95 vs $319.88
- Up to 87% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-3820 - $0.07 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
616
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
13.461538461538463%
Price, $
$319.88
12%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362784 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
614
99.67532467532467%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362784 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
94.16531604538088%
Multi-Core
992
43.14919530230535%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
