Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 2241 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G4900 - 277 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $50.0 vs $319.88
- Up to 84% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-3820 - $0.18 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
277
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
15.65217391304348%
Price, $
$319.88
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362768 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
276
99.63898916967509%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
99.83792544570503%
Multi-Core
1051
45.715528490648104%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |