Buy on Amazon
$498.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $303
Availability
MSRP in USD: $303
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 61% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-8300 - 37 vs 23 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $47.98 vs $498.95
- Up to 85% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-4765T - $2.09 vs $13.49 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.49/FPS
15.492957746478872%
Price, $
$498.95
9%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7 i7-4765T Quad-core (4 Core) 2 GHz Processor - Socket H3 LGA-1150OEM Pack - 1 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 3 GHz Overclocking Speed - 22 nm - 3 Number of Monitors Supported - Intel HD 4600 Gr
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362718 minutes ago
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
23
62.16216216216216%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
CHUANGWEI AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3.3 GHz Eight-Core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W FX-8300 Bulk Package
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362717 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
