Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2427 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-4820K - 181 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $150.0 vs $199.88
- Up to 34% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-4820K - $0.83 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
160
88.39779005524862%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
66.39999999999999%
Price, $
$199.88
75%
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358253 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
39.40119760479042%
Multi-Core
2440
42.119799758329016%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |