Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1493 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-5930K - 233 vs 231 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $530.0 vs $549.95
- Up to 5% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-5930K - $2.27 vs $2.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5930K - 24 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280402 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$530
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5930K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell E | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |