Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2068 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-5930K - 122 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $112.53 vs $549.95
- Up to 80% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-5930K - $0.92 vs $4.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
119
97.54098360655738%
Value, $/FPS
$4.62/FPS
19.913419913419915%
Price, $
$549.95
20%
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1156
80.3894297635605%
Multi-Core
5480
95.28777603894974%
Intel Core i7-5930K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |