Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 639 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Celeron G1820 - 171 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $46.41 vs $99.9
- Up to 52% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-6700T - $0.28 vs $0.58 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
48.27586206896552%
Price, $
$99.9
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360830 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
163
95.32163742690058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360829 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
41.50464919695689%
Multi-Core
825
23.13516545148626%
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |