Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1693 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 14% better in Minecraft than FX-8150 - 683 vs 597 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $64.03 vs $108.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-6800K - $0.11 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
683
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
68.75%
Price, $
$108
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360825 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
597
87.40849194729137%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |