Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2065 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Core i7-6950X - 215 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $94.98 vs $651.07
- Up to 87% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6950X - $0.44 vs $3.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 58 vs 140 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
199
92.55813953488372%
Value, $/FPS
$3.27/FPS
13.455657492354739%
Price, $
$651.07
14%
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349036 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349036 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |