Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 217 days older than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-7100T - 173 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $66.82 vs $651.07
- Up to 89% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-6950X - $0.4 vs $3.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.76/FPS
10.638297872340427%
Price, $
$651.07
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363245 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
169
97.6878612716763%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
86.17760617760618%
Multi-Core
2260
26.755060968391142%
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |