Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320 - 129 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $102.02 vs $150.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-7700T - $0.86 vs $1.16 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
74.13793103448276%
Price, $
$150
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360554 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
118
91.47286821705426%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360553 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |