Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 2122 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $48.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6700 - $0.32 vs $0.87 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-860 - 172 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
151
87.79069767441861%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361824 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
36.7816091954023%
Price, $
$150
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361825 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
34.493426140757926%
Multi-Core
1463
35.33816425120773%
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |