Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $48.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10900K - $0.25 vs $2.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Core i7-860 - 206 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
189
91.74757281553399%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362589 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
10.504201680672269%
Price, $
$490
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362589 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
25.50028587764437%
Multi-Core
1463
15.966386554621847%
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |