Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700 is 202 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 190 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $260.26 vs $530.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.37 vs $2.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348669 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
96.3157894736842%
Value, $/FPS
$2.9/FPS
47.24137931034483%
Price, $
$530
49%
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |