Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700F is 202 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 147 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $389.88 vs $530.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $2.65 vs $3.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$389.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349159 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
138
93.87755102040816%
Value, $/FPS
$3.84/FPS
69.01041666666666%
Price, $
$530
73%
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |