Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Athlon 3000G - 249 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $63.83 vs $244.77
- Up to 71% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-10900F - $0.28 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
28.571428571428577%
Price, $
$244.77
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349338 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
224
89.95983935742971%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
57.10023866348448%
Multi-Core
1975
23.43935437930216%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |