Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2515 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than FX-9590 - 205 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than FX-9590 - $244.77 vs $298.02
- Up to 24% better value when playing Valheim than FX-9590 - $1.19 vs $1.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348792 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
190
92.6829268292683%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
75.79617834394904%
Price, $
$298.02
82%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348791 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |