Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-9100F - 138 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $115.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 52% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10900F - $0.85 vs $1.77 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
48.02259887005649%
Price, $
$244.77
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349103 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
135
97.82608695652173%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
81.98090692124104%
Multi-Core
3669
43.54379302159981%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |