Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2602 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3220 - 134 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $79.0 vs $615.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10900X - $0.66 vs $4.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.59/FPS
14.379084967320264%
Price, $
$615
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349748 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
119
88.80597014925374%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349747 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
33.31218274111675%
Multi-Core
1085
11.578273396649237%
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i3 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |