Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 381 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $530.0 vs $827.21
- Up to 34% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10920X - $2.66 vs $4.04 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.04/FPS
65.84158415841584%
Price, $
$827.21
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $827.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
97.07317073170731%
Value, $/FPS
$2.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$530
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
76.05970149253731%
Multi-Core
7454
65.67979557670279%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |