Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 30% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3930 - 144 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $98.02 vs $270.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-11900 - $0.88 vs $1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
46.808510638297875%
Price, $
$270
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361347 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
111
77.08333333333334%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361346 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
28.544600938967136%
Multi-Core
1043
11.83076225045372%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |