Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2996 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3210 - 194 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $70.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900F - $0.46 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
37.096774193548384%
Price, $
$240
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361996 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
152
78.35051546391753%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
23.445416858590512%
Multi-Core
1018
11.1002071747901%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |