Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 12% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-2400S - 144 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $70.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-11900K - $0.55 vs $1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
29.891304347826086%
Price, $
$265
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349340 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
128
88.88888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
20.919443272880642%
Multi-Core
1352
12.349287541103397%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |