Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-7400T - 271 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $63.5 vs $265.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-11900K - $0.28 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
271
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
28.571428571428577%
Price, $
$265
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349341 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
226
83.39483394833948%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349342 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
42.89329396878954%
Multi-Core
2806
25.630252100840334%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |