Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 145% better in FIFA 23 than FX-4300 - 230 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $48.02 vs $240.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-11900KF - $0.51 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
49.03846153846153%
Price, $
$240
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361998 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
94
40.869565217391305%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361998 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |