Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3586 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 111% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium G840 - 492 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $45.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-11900KF - $0.19 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
492
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
38.775510204081634%
Price, $
$240
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361988 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
233
47.357723577235774%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361987 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
439
18.946914113077256%
Multi-Core
745
7.3580246913580245%
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Pentium G840 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |