Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8120 - 197 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $78.02 vs $240.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900KF - $0.52 vs $1.22 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
42.622950819672134%
Price, $
$240
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361801 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
150
76.14213197969542%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |