Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 48% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 492 vs 333 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $94.05 vs $240.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-11900KF - $0.28 vs $0.49 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
492
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
57.14285714285715%
Price, $
$240
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361165 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
333
67.6829268292683%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
50.92792403970652%
Multi-Core
5480
54.123456790123456%
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |