Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1128 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 37% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 239 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $350.99 vs $530.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.47 vs $3.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
239
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$350.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $350.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348917 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
175
73.22175732217573%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
48.51485148514852%
Price, $
$530
66%
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
50.11801730920536%
Multi-Core
7454
50.09071970969693%
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |