Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 414 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 194 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $109.99 vs $468.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-9900K - $0.65 vs $2.41 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.41/FPS
26.970954356846473%
Price, $
$468
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $468 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348676 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
170
87.62886597938144%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
70.02398081534771%
Multi-Core
5794
72.78894472361809%
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |