Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 183 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 2600X - 58 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $99.97 vs $595.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9920X - $1.79 vs $10.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.26/FPS
17.446393762183238%
Price, $
$595
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349821 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
56
96.55172413793103%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349821 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
87.54423213021938%
Multi-Core
5263
55.740309256513456%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |