Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 249 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 13% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 2200G - 59 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $130.0 vs $870.7
- Up to 83% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9940X - $2.5 vs $14.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.76/FPS
16.93766937669377%
Price, $
$870.7
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $870.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349450 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
52
88.13559322033898%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349450 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
68.33447566826594%
Multi-Core
2858
26.62567542388671%
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |