Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 414 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 59 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $109.99 vs $870.7
- Up to 86% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9940X - $2.0 vs $14.76 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.76/FPS
13.550135501355015%
Price, $
$870.7
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $870.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349454 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
55
93.22033898305084%
Value, $/FPS
$2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
80.05483207676491%
Multi-Core
5794
53.978013787963484%
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |