Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1254 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 25% better in Sea of Thieves than EPYC 7742 - 287 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 150 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 150 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |