Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1615 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900F - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 32% better in Far Cry 6 than EPYC 7742 - 178 vs 135 FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
