Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3438 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $100.0 vs $216.23
- Up to 43% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 7600X - $0.9 vs $1.57 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 24% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 138 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
111
80.43478260869566%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
57.324840764331206%
Price, $
$216.23
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $216.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |