Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $100.0 vs $389.88
- Up to 63% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-9700F - $0.76 vs $2.07 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 42% better in War Thunder than FX-6350 - 188 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
132
70.2127659574468%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349101 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
36.71497584541063%
Price, $
$389.88
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |