Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $100.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-10900K - $0.61 vs $2.74 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 10% better in God of War than FX-6350 - 179 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
163
91.06145251396647%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349229 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
22.262773722627735%
Price, $
$490
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |