Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-3220 - 251 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $79.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-10900K - $0.38 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
19.48717948717949%
Price, $
$490
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349342 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
209
83.26693227091634%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
30.017152658662095%
Multi-Core
1085
11.841100076394193%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |