Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 40% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-6100 - 63 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $100.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900K - $2.22 vs $7.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.78/FPS
28.53470437017995%
Price, $
$490
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348679 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
45
71.42857142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
68.26758147512865%
Multi-Core
2336
25.493833897195238%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |