Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 3 3200G - 251 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $80.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-10900K - $0.35 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
17.94871794871795%
Price, $
$490
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349343 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
227
90.43824701195219%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
60.148656375071475%
Multi-Core
3013
32.88224380661355%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |