Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-8150 outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-8150 and the more expensive FX-8120 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8120 - 318 vs 317 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than FX-8120 - $64.03 vs $78.02
- Up to 20% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-8120 - $0.2 vs $0.25 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358171 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
318
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |