Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2750 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $64.03 vs $115.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i3-9100F - $0.97 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 52% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than FX-8150 - 100 vs 66 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361016 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
84.34782608695653%
Price, $
$115
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361017 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |