Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - $64.03 vs $244.85
- Up to 69% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-13500 - $0.4 vs $1.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 17% better in God of War than FX-8150 - 189 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
162
85.71428571428571%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361640 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
30.76923076923077%
Price, $
$244.85
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361640 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |