Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2564 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $64.03 vs $170.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-9600K - $0.53 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-8150 - 153 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
121
79.08496732026144%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361413 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
47.74774774774775%
Price, $
$170
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361414 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |