Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8320 is 377 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than FX-8120 - 234 vs 233 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 24% cheaper than FX-8320 - $78.02 vs $102.02
- Up to 25% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-8320 - $0.33 vs $0.44 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361049 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
233
99.57264957264957%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361049 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |