Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $102.02 vs $160.68
- Up to 29% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600KF - $0.8 vs $1.13 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8320 - 142 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
127
89.43661971830986%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349340 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
70.79646017699116%
Price, $
$160.68
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |