Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600 is 982 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than FX-8320 - 224 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than FX-8320 - $74.0 vs $102.02
- Up to 31% better value when playing Fortnite than FX-8320 - $0.33 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
212
94.64285714285714%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
68.75000000000001%
Price, $
$102.02
72%
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360844 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360844 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |